Why more accurate compliance data helps prove yourself to correspondent banking partners
“Digital transformation” is a banking buzzword. But when is it truly effective in the fight against financial crime? We explain what you need to know.
The FATF has released their assessment of Germany's AML/CFT efforts, a 324 page report, which calls for a more unified data and analytics approach.
The current sanctions landscape is incredibly fast-moving, showing little sign of slowing down. Using innovative tools can help firms navigate it.
In this rapidly changing political landscape - here's how to overcome KYC challenges when evaluating sanctions risk.
De-risking can often be one of the first responses to working with banks in high risk categories. But does it have to be?
Despite the high compliance spending of FIs, more than 99% of money laundering proceeds remain in the hands of criminal gangs - we explain why.
The current framework for managing AML risk is underperforming despite the investments being made in terms of raw compliance spend.
Can compliance teams really be expected to go through 11.9 million Pandora Papers' files by themselves?
Financial crime is pervasive, dynamic, and often on such a scale that even the most apparently safe industries and regions are open for exploitation.
De-risking emerged as an unintended result of banks with limited alternatives to new regulations. Technology is the strongest ally to fix this.
All too often, highly capable respondent banks are left disempowered by the industry's commonplace top-down financial crime risk management practices.
Without a right strategy and technology to support it, executives and Board Members put themselves at risk of being found liable for financial crime.
Banks don't view the work of compliance departments as providing financial value but rather as a “cost center”. This view can be a big mistake.